Or how about spending more than two years of diet politico-media to the rank of chief judge of the quinquennium of Francois Hollande. On France 2, Sunday night, and then in The World, on Monday, Vincent Peillon, a candidate in the primary of the left, assured wanting to embody the “gathering” to “win” the left” and “make a claim to truth”, particularly about the balance of the head of State, with which the former Education minister Jean-Marc Ayrault wants to pose as the heir.
READ ALSO: “One cannot just become a candidate,” said Valls after the application of Peillon
Left to do this, to do the sorting in the policy carried out since 2012 by distributing both the good and the bad points of his opponents in the primary to the left. And, in particular, to the address of Manuel Valls with which the duel is well and truly launched.
Loyalty to Holland (the one before 2014)
retreating to the shores of lake Neuchâtel in December 2014 to teach the philosophy, the professor Peillon can indeed boast of not being accountable to the entire balance sheet of the quinquennium of Francois Hollande. “I’m the party of the government in 2014″, he insists in The World, like to sweep the idea to be carried away by the discharge generated by the head of State with the French.
A “departure” that Vincent Peillon has a tendency to slightly embellish: in march 2014, it is François Hollande and Manuel Valls, who had decided to end his lease in the rue de Grenelle, the fault of his want of application to the european elections and the resounding clashes of communication.
But, in The World, the champion of self-proclaimed”political ethics” wants to become the lawyer number 1 president’s unloved, a victim, according to him, “judgments unjust”: “A country like France, which has restored its public accounts, and social without attacking the social model, it is unique. Better, reforms, progress has been made, with the account difficulty, the hiring of public servants in the police or the school, the youth guarantee, the complementary health to all, contraception is free for girls, rent, the COP21, the marriage for all…”, he explains.
As in echo to the speech of resignation of François Hollande on December 1, during which the head of State himself had praised the reforms implemented since 2012.
To better tackle its rivals in the primary, Arnaud Montebourg, Benoît Hamon, the candidate Peillon is paid even the luxury on Sunday evening on France 2, recalled that it was “the party of the government before those who perhaps do not have the air of wanting to suffer from their own balance sheet.” Curious paradox which wants that the more one has left the Dutch ship, sooner, more people would be loyal to the head of State.
Anti-vallsisme almost assumed
Still, it is Manuel Valls, professor Peillon reserve his best protrusions. He who says that he never would have been introduced in the face of François Hollande, where a party of the left accuses the former Prime minister of having soaped the plank to the head of State.
And the only reserves on the balance sheet of the quinquennium, issued by the former minister of Education all bear the seal of the former tenant of Matignon: “We can only regret that it has not been of sufficient counterparty to the covenant of responsibility”, says he, not to mention tackle “the method of government, with a political base that is too narrow” and the “brutality, such as the 49-3 in the act work”.
READ more >> “One can’t improvise candidate,” said Valls after the application of Peillon
Vincent Peillon, who assures not to be “exploited person”, takes a clear distance with Manuel Valls: “I have my political identity, my project. I have never changed my line. I have always defended the 35-hour, I never said that I wanted to remove the solidarity tax on wealth [...] I do not understand that we have been able to support orders against the burkini.”
The strategy of “returning”, however, has its limits: very discreet since its introduction to the green in 2014, the european parliament is far from having always blasted the policy pursued by Manuel Valls. The person concerned might say today they were “deeply shocked” by the debate on the deprivation of nationality, it should definitely have the ear fine to hear the protests of Vincent Peillon since its swiss mountains. Not the shadow of a criticism or even a doubt issued publicly. And for good reason, the new opponent of Manuel Valls is “the refusal[was] criticizing the deprivation of nationality, or the law work,” wrote Liberation in April, reminds us of Marianne.
No comments:
Post a Comment