Thursday, January 19, 2017

The third debate of the primary on the left : we have noted the … – The Parisian

Which, of socialist Benoît Hamon, Arnaud Montebourg, Vincent Peillon, and Manuel Valls, the radical left Sylvia Pinel or environmentalist Jean-Luc Bennahmias and François de Rugy has won the debate ?

Le jury of the Parisian deliberate. The journalists from the political department has noted this Sunday, the delivery of each of the candidates of this third debate of the primary to the left according to the five criteria. The precision, the style, fair-play, the best formula and combativeness. Each journalist has proposed a note on ten points. The one that we offer is therefore the result of an average.

ARNAUD MONTEBOURG : 7/10

Eloquent. It has been slow to return in the match. Arnaud Montebourg has started to pass on the trade between Benoît Hamon and Manuel Valls before mingle in the dance. The former minister of economics, who had bridled his nature in the previous two debates, then found his eloquence and his punch. He convinced on the heart of his project, the economic recovery? The time will no doubt be missed. As to explain his proposal for “terms of employment for the young people of the popular districts” .Nevertheless, a good performance overall.

MANUEL VALLS : 7/10

Farm. Less tense and less on the defensive than in the first two debates, the former Prime minister has even forced zygomatic arches, outlining a few grin – mocking ? – to the place of its competitors. He had also sharpened his sense of the formula, by dropping about deficits under control that he doesn’t want “a left which made proposals to credit for losing then his credit “. Valls was limited on Thursday evening the case, after a sequence delicate marked by the slap received Tuesday in the margin of a movement in Brittany.

BENOIT HAMON : 6,5/10

Solid. Everything except Hamon ? This Thursday, all the candidates, except Bennahmias that it has released a ” Benedict, do not be discouraged ! “, have fallen to arm shortcuts on Benoît Hamon and his universal income. Not anything to get over the ex-minister of Education : “There always arises the question of how much it costs, not how much it pays “, response-t-it. Questioned on his method to reduce the debt, it is doing by comparing debt accounting and environmental debt : “We can negotiate with a banker, but not with the planet. “

FRANÇOIS DE RUGY : 6/10

be Consistent. First distinctive sign : a burgundy tie when the others have a blue… François de Rugy remains faithful to his favourite themes, the ecologist proposes ” that there was a plan for environmental health “, making the hunt for endocrine disruptors. He wants to impose the French meat in canteens and 100 % of the energy produced in France in 2050. Qualified, by journalist Fabien Namias, free swinger, Rugy replicate : “Neither on the economic nor on any other plan. “Arousing laughter on the set.

VINCENT PEILLON : 5,5/10

Serious. As in previous debates, professor Vincent Peillon has kept its side donor of lessons. The tone is asked, but the mep is sometimes biting. On the encryption programs, Peillon has targeted Hamon and his proposal for a universal income. “Quite a left that made promises and disappoints the next day “, a-t-it down, denouncing the lack of credibility of his comrade. To fight inequality, he defended the creation of a true public service to retirement homes to make them more accessible.

JEAN-LUC BENNAHMIAS : 4/10

Spontaneous. “We are talking about health and the environment ! Awesome!!! “he started from the outset yesterday. So is Jean-Luc Bennahmias, spontaneous… and (very) quirky. Not always credible, they will have had the merit of relaxing the atmosphere. But not that… Happy to be there, he defended a few ideas with conviction, and put her messy energy to the service of Benoît Hamon and his universal income : “the only new idea”, he congratulated the candidate of the left wing before the pray is not to ” discourage “. Beyond the score Sunday, he has already won the price for the sympathy !

SYLVIA PINEL : 3/10

School. Placed in the center of the device at the end of a draw, Sylvia Pinel has not managed to impose in its exchanges at the end of the last debate. A sign ? The radical left Sylvia Pinel, former minister of Housing was often very late at the level of the word time. Visibly uncomfortable at the beginning of the show, it ânonne its responses in a voice monotonous before you gain insurance as much as in accuracy in the trade thread.

QUESTION OF the DAY.

Primary to left : at the end of the three debates, which candidate has been the most convincing to you ?

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment